INTRDUCTION
Thanks to the rapid advancement of
technnology, online learning became a part of education around the world. With
courses available in almost every subject, and flexible time tables to suit
almost every lifestyle, students are increasingly turning to online learning as
an altenative to on- campus study. It allows students to study abroad remotely,
at a university not in their home country.
Advances
in technology now allow students to study entirely online while still
socializing with classmates, watching lectures and participating in
subject-specific discussions. Related to this developments, this term we
discussed some topics for our Open and Distance Leaarning lesson. In this
article there are some key points about this discussions.
CONTENT
We
discussed four article releated to online education. For each week we had basic
topics. These are ; online teaching and learning, forms of presence in online
enviroment, online learning engagement, and flipped classroom.
In
our first video we disccused about online teaching and learning. First of all
we focused the term of “technology”. We thought that using technology in the
lessons makes students more motivated and it is an encompassing. We defined
synchronous and asynchronous learning. Synchronous learning is online or
distance education that happens in real time, often with a set class schedule
and required login times. Asynchronous learning does not require real-time
interaction; instead, content is available online for students to access when
it best suits their schedules, and assignments are completed to deadlines.
Level
one is (At the bottom of this pyramid) there is; Basic ICT competence
Level two; is Specific Ttechnical Competence
for the software,
Level three is ; Dealing with Constrains and
Possibilities of the Medium,
Level four is ; Online Socialization,
Level
five is; Facilitating Communicative Competence,
Level
six is; Creativity and Choice
Level
seven is; ( at the top of the pyramid) Own Style
At the end of the our
meeting we decided that “there is a critical need not only pedagogical
innovation, but for sustained attention to how new tools and environments function
from the point of view of learners, and through careful scaffolding to extend the
value they can derive from technology‐mediated distance language teaching.
Second week we discussed
forms of presence in the online environment. We defined “presence” which
means the sense of ‘being there’ and ‘being together’. Briefly , interactions
with others in online environment and being aware of students and the teacher
are present at a location remote from their own immidiate environment. To
create presence in the online environment, we need to think, feel, and behave
differently than we do in the face - to - face environment because we have to
make an effort to be aware of the intentions of others and their thoughts,
emotions, and behaviors when they are connected to us via technology
Finally, the concept of presence is not easy to
understand and I think it is hard to
create it in online lessons. Because the instructor and learners are not in the
same physical space. Presence is result of insteraction of thought, emotion and
behaviour in the online world and the outer world. Therefore it has different
aspects. Such as; social, psychological and emotional. In today’s world we need
to create an online learning community. To create an effective online community
we can not ignore the importance of social, cognitive and instructor presence.
In our third discussion we talked about online learning
engagement. We start the topic trying to find a key term for engagement. Such
as; interaction. Interaction between learner-learner, learner-instructor and
learner content. Then we talked about the importance of engagement for Language
classes. And we touched behaviour engagement (reflecting in manipulation of the
interface through actions such as clicking, navigating,
submitting,scrolling) and cognitive
engagement. ( reflected by students thinking about and working through the
learning meterial at a deeper level)
At the last week of the discussions we talked about
Flipped classroom. We start with bloom’s taxonomy about flipped learning.
CONCLUSION
The goal of this
discussions is to provide a brief
outline of how we can do much better open and distance learning. To do
this we read some articles related to online teaching and learning, forms of
presence in online enviroment, online learning engagement, and flipped classroom.
Thanks to this articles
and our investigations we reached some outcomes. This outcomes might be simply
be summerised as:
·
The need for ongoing attention to
learner support that adds value to individual learning agendas, attention to
community and affikiations within that, feedback on individual and collective
activity, and careful consideration of the affective aspects of distance
language learning. There is a critical need not only for pedagogical innovation
but for sustained attention to how new tools and enviroments functions from the
point of view of learners and through careful scaffolding to extent the value
they can derive from technology- mediated distance language teaching.
·
Fostering feeling of being there and
being together are so important in creating online presence. Also there is some
difference between presence and engagement.
·
It is hard to see engagement online, but
using a range of measures and metrics we can get a sense of it.
·
Flipped language classroom
not only improved students’ academic performance and cultivated their learning
motivation but also developed their self-regulation, confidence, and
higher-order thinking skills. the effects of external and learner factors on
the flipped learning approach, students’ readiness and technology acceptance,
the flipped learning process, students' interactions, and teacher perceptions.
NOTE: I
uploded my article to my blog.
here
is my blog link: http://techno-englogic.blogspot.com/
REFERENCES
BIOCCA,
F., BURGOON, J. H., & STONER, M. (2001). Criteria and scope conditions
for a theory and measure of social presence. Fourth Internatıonal Workshop.
eteachonline. (2020, 09 27). ınstructor presence:
https://www.eteachonline.com/blog/onlinepresence adresinden alındı
Kennedy, G. (2020). What is student engagement in
online learning ... and how do I know when it is there? Melborn discussion
paper, 2.
Kurt, S. (2018, 05 13). educational technology.
https://educationaltechnology.net/flipped-classroom/ adresinden alındı
Lehman, R. M., & Conceição, S. C. (2010). The
Role of Presence in The Online Environment. Creating a Sense of Presence
in Online Teaching. "How to be there for distance learners" (s.
2). içinde USA: JOSSY-BASS.
ResourcEd.
(2018). How to overcome flipped learning obstacles:
https://resourced.prometheanworld.com/obstacles-flipped-learning-overcome/
adresinden alındı
STAFF, T. (2021, 02 18). the best schools.
Synchronous Learning vs. Asynchronous Learning in Online Education:
https://thebestschools.org/magazine/synchronous-vs-asynchronous-education/
adresinden alındı
WHITE, C. J. (2017). Distance Language Teaching with
technology. C. A. CHAPELLE, & S. SAURO içinde, The Handbook of
Technology and Second Language Teaching and Learning (s. 145). USA: WILEY
BLACKWELL.
Hiç yorum yok:
Yorum Gönder